USPTO Processing Delays – Do They Matter?

By Joshua Goldberg, Co-Managing Partner    Throughout the past year, we have occasionally seen certain processing delays from the USPTO for various submissions. For the most part, these processing delays are nothing more than a minor annoyance. However, at times these processing delays can present a real barrier to progress. How should an Applicant work [...]

By |2026-08-28T13:02:12+00:00August, 2026|Uncategorized|0 Comments

New USPTO Rule for Non-US Entities Now In-Force – What We’re Seeing

By Joshua Goldberg, Co-Managing Partner    The previously announced U.S. Patent & Trademark Rule requiring patent applicants, assignees, and owners who are not domiciled in the U.S. to be represented by a USPTO registered patent attorney or agent entered into force on July 20, 2026. This seems straightforward enough. The two weeks’ worth of data [...]

By |2026-08-28T13:01:18+00:00August, 2026|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Artificial intelligence and the “natural person” criterion in patent inventorship

We are pleased to share that Joshua B. Goldberg, Co-Managing Partner at Nath, Goldberg & Meyer, has been published through Springer Nature. His article, Artificial intelligence and the "natural person" criterion in patent inventorship , addresses a timely issue for university research leaders: how AI, research activity, publication, and intellectual property are becoming increasingly interconnected. [...]

By |2026-08-17T15:45:44+00:00August, 2026|Uncategorized|0 Comments

New USPTO Rule for Non-US Entities Now In-Force, What We’re Seeing

By Joshua Goldberg, Co-Managing Partner  The previously announced U.S. Patent & Tardemark Rule requiring patent applicants, assignees, and owners who are not domiciled in the U.S. to be represented by a USPTO registered patent attorney or agent entered into force on July 20, 2026. This seems straightforward enough. The two weeks’ worth of data we [...]

By |2026-08-11T15:48:10+00:00August, 2026|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Government-Funded Innovation and IP Risk: Bayh-Dole and March in Rights

Introduction Many if not all are likely aware that colleges and universities provide some of the most cutting-edge research in the country. What few people know is that it was not always this way. In fact, universities had difficulties with retaining ownership of inventions developed with federal research funding until passage of the Bayh-Dole Act [...]

By |2026-07-17T14:32:16+00:00July, 2026|Uncategorized|0 Comments

Managing the Impact on Innovation of a Lead Researcher Leaving a University

By Joshua Goldberg, Co-Managing Partner  Introduction The departure of a lead researcher from a university is often viewed through the lens of lost research grants, publications, and academic prestige. However, in today's innovation-driven environment, one of the most significant consequences may be the effect of the departure on the university's intellectual property (IP) portfolio, patent [...]

By |2026-07-17T14:21:51+00:00July, 2026|Uncategorized|0 Comments

The University Inventor Playbook: Part 10

Recurring Challenges in Academic Inventor Engagement By Joshua Goldberg, Co-Managing Partner  Common challenges include misunderstandings about patentability standards, premature public disclosures, and difficulty coordinating across large, interdisciplinary teams. Academic culture, which prioritizes openness and dissemination of knowledge, may conflict with the confidentiality requirements of patenting. Addressing these challenges requires ongoing education, clear processes, and strong [...]

By |2026-06-17T16:08:33+00:00July, 2026|Uncategorized|0 Comments

New USPTO Rule for Non-US Entities In-Force Today, July 20: What Does This Mean for You?

The previously announced U.S. Patent & Trademark Rule requiring patent applicants, assignees, and owners who are not domiciled in the U.S. to be represented by a USPTO registered patent attorney or agent is entered in-force today, July 20, 2026. This policy is cited by the U.S. Department of Commerce as common with those already existent [...]

By |2026-07-20T15:12:27+00:00July, 2026|Uncategorized|1 Comment

The University Inventor Playbook: Part 9

Maintaining Inventor Engagement By Joshua Goldberg, Co-Managing Partner  Maintaining engagement throughout the patent lifecycle can be challenging in academia due to competing demands on researchers’ time, the long duration of patent prosecution, and inventor unfamiliarity with the process. Effective approaches to resolve this difficulty can include minimizing administrative burden, scheduling targeted interactions, and providing clear, [...]

By |2026-06-17T16:02:35+00:00July, 2026|Uncategorized|0 Comments

The University Inventor Playbook: Part 8

Role of Outside Counsel in Academic Settings By Joshua Goldberg, Co-Managing Partner  Outside counsel plays a central role in university patenting activities, as most TTOs rely heavily on external firms for patent application drafting and prosecution. Effective coordination between TTO staff, inventors, and outside counsel is essential. Outside counsel must be able to communicate effectively [...]

By |2026-06-17T15:56:57+00:00July, 2026|Uncategorized|0 Comments
Go to Top